2008年8月30日星期六

拉萨今天“雪顿”了




【中国官媒报道“雪顿节展佛仪式在哲蚌寺隆重举行”http://info.tibet.cn/news/xzxw/whhb/200808/t20080830_423277.htm】


说是,拉萨今天在热烈地过“雪顿节”。

去拉萨旅游的朋友说,上午去哲蚌寺看晒大佛了,10点钟开始,12点钟结束。

问他去的人多不,他说多呢,好多藏民呢。问他抬唐卡的是什么人,他说反正是穿红衣服的人。

当然,他们——了不起的导演们,会在拉萨上演“雪顿”这场戏的。

哲蚌寺、色拉寺、甘丹寺的僧人们,已经抓了一千多,剩下不多的僧人们只能不得不出来“晒大佛”了。寺管会的命令谁敢不听从?不去?不去的话,武警和公安就会扭送到格尔木的“关塔拉摩”那。

绕木齐、冲赛康、嘎玛衮桑那一片片藏人聚居区,被抓走的藏人有多少?胆颤心惊的藏人们只能不得不出来过“雪顿”了。居委会的命令谁敢不听从?不去?不去的话,每年200元的肉食补贴立即取消。

3·14以后,只要外国媒体来访,退休干部、在职干部就会被派到寺院,假装朝佛的信徒,围着佛像转啊转。不去?不去的话,退休金取消,公职开除。等外国记者走了,那就不准再去寺院了。再去?退休金取消,公职开除。

呵呵,今天,挤挤攘攘地去哲蚌、色拉看晒大佛的人们;今天,挤挤攘攘地去罗布林卡看“拉姆”的人们,假啊假,假作真时真亦假,什么都是假的,连心也是假的,只有泪水是真的,泪往心里流。

呵呵,动作真够快的,新华社的消息已经出来了,说拉萨人民“喜迎雪顿节”呢。中国西藏信息中心的照片也出来了,去年展佛时勒令取消的藏戏,今年展佛时又变魔术般的出现了,竟然厚颜声称是“传统仪式”,真健忘啊,怎么去年就不继承“传统”呢?

有人说:今日中国——“小康小康是假,宗教宗教是假,改革改革是假,开放开放是假,发展发展是假”,我得说:今日拉萨——雪顿雪顿是假!和谐和谐是假!

2008-8-30


附一篇写去年“雪顿”的文章:

今年“雪顿”不正常

文/ 唯色

8月12日上午,巨大的释迦牟尼佛像唐卡在拉萨著名的哲蚌寺迟迟展出,数万信徒和中外游客在场,许多藏人已察觉出与往年相比很异常。而官方媒体的报道却是一片赞美盛世佳节的欢声,并用张张绚丽的图片烘托气氛。不过细看图片,抬唐卡上山和展示唐卡的大多是穿俗装的普通人,传统上,承担这些事务的必是数百名穿袈裟的僧侣。

哲蚌寺展佛是西藏重要的宗教节日——“雪顿”的序幕。从1642年起,每年藏历6月30日,拉萨百姓会前往哲蚌寺,向恪守戒律的僧人奉献酸奶,附近各地擅长藏戏的民众也会带上面具和彩衣赶来演出。随着藏戏鼓点急促响起,寺院僧侣会在法号和诵经声中举行盛大法会,并从大殿中抬出锦缎绣制的巨幅唐卡,在旭日照耀的山坡上展开,慰藉众生心灵。随后,各地藏戏演员会在达赖喇嘛的夏宫——罗布林卡演出多日,以示隆重的供奉。这个从相互施舍中得到快乐的节日,在上世纪六七十年代,被毛泽东发动的运动中断多年。

如今的西藏虽又恢复诸多的传统节日,但在同一个政权的控制之下,往往徒有虚名。原本严格的传承、固定的时间和完整的程序,随时被要求根据形势的变化增添、删减或调整,得不到丝毫尊重。如近年来,在商业化的冲击下,“雪顿”这个宗教节日已演变为商业节日,当局的口号是“文化搭台,经贸唱戏”,实则是“宗教搭台,经贸唱戏”,神圣的展佛则成了吸引“招商引资”和标榜信仰自由的表演节目。

而今年“雪顿”所遭到的打击可谓文革之后最严重。“雪顿”前夕,当局勒令取消展佛之前的藏戏演出,理由是场地小,人太多,担心发生意外。这个决定震惊了哲蚌寺,僧侣们表示如果取消传统藏戏,那么“雪顿”就不成其为“雪顿”了;更有喇嘛大胆直言:这些年来,西藏的宗教活动一个个被取缔,西藏的宗教权利一项项被剥夺,而我们已经不得不放弃了“默朗钦莫”(藏历新年的祈愿大法会)、“江央贡却”(冬季辨经大法会),现在又要在展佛时放弃“拉姆”(藏戏),这是再也不能服从的。于是僧人们采取的对策是拒不参加展佛。

按惯例,展佛时间应是太阳初升之时,当众僧把巨幅唐卡缓缓展开,金色阳光恰好照耀在美丽的佛颜上,显得无比辉煌。如此壮美景象,我曾几次目睹,深受震撼。如此壮美景象,穿绛红袈裟的众僧绝对是其中一部分,不可缺少也不可替代。所以当太阳升起良久,等候展佛的信众和游客布满哲蚌寺的后山,而僧人们集体闭门不出,令当局有关部门大为恼怒。据说后来是在软硬兼施之下,才有十多名僧人与一群维持秩序的保安人员,匆匆地从大殿里抬出了唐卡,并在没有藏戏演出也没有专门法会的情形下,匆匆地在山崖上展开了唐卡。哲蚌寺的一位喇嘛对我说:“像这样没有举行任何仪式的展佛,从无先例。”

(RFA藏语专题节目)

2007-9-4

转贴RFA的英文报道:

Tibetan Monks Still Held in Qinghai

RFA[Friday, August 29, 2008 15:54]
Months after widespread Tibetan protests against Chinese rule, hundreds of monks are detained in Qinghai.

LHASA, Tibet: Chinese policeman keeps watch on crowd as Tibetan Buddhist monks chant prayers at Drepung monastery, August 2003. (Photo: AFP)
KATHMANDU — Hundreds of Tibetan monks detained after widespread protests against Chinese rule earlier this year were deported from the Tibetan capital Lhasa to remote Qinghai province, where they remain in custody, according to Tibetan sources.

Monks from two major Tibetan Buddhist monasteries, Sera and Drepung, both in the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR), may have been targeted because they were seen as playing a leading role in the demonstrations, the sources said.

Many came to study at the two monasteries near Lhasa from remote areas in eastern Tibet where the Kham and Amdo dialects are spoken.

A smaller group of monks was removed from another monastery, Ganden, and taken into detention with the others, the sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Unrest erupted in Lhasa on March 14 after four days of peaceful protests, turning into a day of riots targeting Han Chinese residents and businesses. China reacted by sending in a large force of paramilitary People’s Armed Police to quell the unrest, sealing off the TAR and Tibetan-populated regions of China from contact with the outside world.

Exiled Tibetan leaders say 203 people died in the violence that followed, while Beijing says 22 people died, only one of them Tibetan.

Train from Lhasa

According to an authoritative source who spoke on condition of anonymity, 675 Tibetan monks from the three targeted monasteries were put on a train from Lhasa on April 25.

“Among those 675 monks, 405 were from Drepung, 205 were from Sera, and eight were from Ganden,” the source said. The remaining 57 monks from outlying areas were said to have been taken from smaller Lhasa monasteries.

“They were transported to a military detention center in Golmud” in the Haixi [in Tibetan, Tsonub] Mongol and Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Qinghai, the source said.

“All the monks who came originally from the Qinghai region were [then] deported to their respective towns. They are still detained there in their hometown prisons or detention centers.”

They were escorted home from Golmud by officials from the Qinghai United Front and Religious Affairs Bureau, according to the source.

Monks who came originally from monasteries in the still-troubled region of Kham in Sichuan province are still being held in Golmud, however, the source said. The number of those still in detention cannot be independently confirmed.

Three groups

The monks were rounded up in three groups, the source said.

“On April 10 in the afternoon, security forces detained 550 monks from Drepung monastery, took them to the Nyethang Military School, and detained them on the school campus.”

“Then, on the night of April 14, a huge contingent of Chinese security forces arrived at Sera monastery and took away about 400 monks and detained them at a military prison in Tsal Gungthang,” about 20 kms (12 miles) east of Lhasa, the source said.

“On April 17, a group of monks from Ganden was also rounded up and detained somewhere in Lhasa,” the source added.

All those detained were reported to have suffered harsh treatment, including beatings, while in prison.

“Twenty-four monks from Drepung and Sera monasteries remain in detention at the Nationalities Middle School in the Marpa subdivision of Rebgong in Qinghai province, where they have been held since July 25” after being moved from Lhasa in April, the source said.

Held in a house

Another source with contacts in the region said that a small group of monks from monasteries in Sogpo county in the Malho [in Chinese, Huangnan] Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Qinghai had been studying in Lhasa monasteries at the time of the unrest.

“Recently, they were found detained in a house close to the Sogpo county center,” he said. “They had not been put into prisons but were under some kind of house arrest. Later, we learned that they had been taken into detention in Golmud in April.”

“They are not allowed to leave, but their family members and relatives can see them at the house where they are being held.”

“There were about 30 to 40 monks studying in Lhasa who had come from different monasteries in Gepasumdo [in Chinese, Tongde] county” in the Tsolho [in Chinese, Hainan] Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Qinghai, the source said.

“There were 20 monks from Tsang monastery alone who were studying at Sera. We were told that all of them were detained.”

Brother held

A Tibetan woman living in Rebgong [in Chinese, Tongren] county in the Malho Prefecture said she had learned that her brother, a monk studying in Lhasa, had been taken to the Golmud City Detention Center.

“As you know, he was from Kirti monastery in Aba [in Tibetan, Ngaba] Prefecture [in Sichuan], but was at Sera monastery in Lhasa at the time of the March protests,” she said. “We couldn’t trace him for a long time.”

Lhasa monasteries generally take in many monks from outlying areas, including Qinghai province. “That’s always been the case, historically,” Tibet expert Robbie Barnett, based at Columbia University in New York, said.

These monasteries “have colleges that are specifically designed, and have been for centuries, to accommodate people from those areas,” he added. Efforts beginning in 1994 to stop this practice have largely proven unsuccessful, Barnett said.

Barnett cited reports that the Lhasa protests that began March 10 comprised monks from the Amdo Tibetan area in Qinghai province.

“Some people have said that this was quite definitely the case. And some people have said that this was also true of the Sera and Drepung [demonstrations] on the other two days,” he said, but added:

“I don’t know how strong the evidence is for that.”

Contacted by Radio Free Asia, officials at the Sera Monastery Management Committee hung up the phone, while officials at the Drepung Monastery Management Committee refused to speak to RFA reporters.

Officials at the Huangnan Prefecture Public Security Bureau denied knowledge of any monks being held at the Nationalities Middle School in Rebgong.

Original reporting by RFA’s Tibetan service. Translations by Karma Dorjee. Tibetan service director: Jigme Ngapo. Written and produced in English by Sarah Jackson-Han. Edited by Luisetta Mudie and Richard Finney.

6 条评论:

  1. 不去的话,每年200元的肉食补贴立即取消。

    拿人钱财,替人消灾。真有骨气就不要拿政府的钱,你拿了政府的200块转过脸就闹独立。不揍你揍谁。

    回复删除
  2. 在那里有什么什么正常,作假那是共党的一贯做法。假佛、假雪顿、假展佛。
    一看照片就知道今年的雪顿的规模。展佛就那么几个人。在哲蚌的历史上还没有过。
    所有的西藏宗教活动都是让别人看得,而不是展示佛教本身,他们根本上就像替代佛祖,自己想当“剑折叟”。我看头上还没有这个光环。

    回复删除
  3. 中国民族问题的根源是清政府为了维护满清的统治,而采取的民族隔离的政策,这种影响延续至今。

    满清在国内建立政权之后,便不允许汉人进入东北,以免汉人侵占满人的龙兴之地;不允许蒙古人与汉人通婚接触,以免汉蒙联合;在新疆,屠灭了整个信奉佛教的准格尔民族,使准格尔变为一个单纯的地理名词,为维吾尔民族的兴起创造了空前有利的条件;在西藏,剔除了蒙古人建立的贵族政权,扶植达赖建立政教合一的政权,并推广黄教来,弱化民族好斗的精神;在西南边陲,则继续实行明朝以来的改土归流的政策,使其逐渐汉化。

    在清朝统治的几百年之后,结果是这样的。。。

    龙兴之地的东北,满清政府一直以严刑峻法来抵挡汉人移民的步伐;但在最终,当东北面临沙俄和日本的侵略之后,清政府立刻开放汉人的移民,以汉人来保卫边疆。现在经过一个多世纪之后,满洲已经不复存在,现在这里是富饶的中国东北。

    在广阔的蒙古草原,大漠以南的内蒙古,历史上便与汉人交流接触,由于跟中央政府驻地的京城距离过近,在清朝灭亡之后,汉人的影响越发强大,最终融入了大家庭。而外蒙古由于地处大漠以北,历史上汉人基本不去;再加上当时孱弱的中国无法抵挡苏联的威逼,只得同意这部分领土,任由苏联的摆布,最终成为了一个独立而贫穷的国家。当然,在这个过程中也出现了反复,当苏联人在蒙古建立共产党政权的时候,统治蒙古的贵族便直接要求回到中国,遗憾的是,当时的中国政府无力给予帮助。

    在新疆,清政府屠灭了叛乱的准噶尔民族后,信奉伊斯兰的维吾尔民族便失去了天敌。在中国力量消弱的时候,在苏联的不怀好意的策动之下,维吾尔也试图脱离中国。但遗憾的是,晚了。因为中国内部已经统一了,建立了强有力的中央政府,所以维吾尔民族的独立基本上是没有希望的,也是没有出路的。

    在西南边陲,清政府将明朝的屯堡戍边政策进一步强化,形成了改土归流政策,这使得边疆的少数民族,逐渐脱离了奴隶制度为基础的土司社会,西南地区由于实行了和汉人地区同样的社会制度,在经济上逐渐活跃,在政治上也逐渐进入了中央体制。目前这里的民族问题已经完全解决,汉人和其他的民族和睦相处,亲密无间一起致力与发展和建设。

    在西藏,清政府没有采取明朝的分封的体制,而是帮助驱逐了入侵的准噶尔人,并建立了驻藏大臣的制度,完善活佛转世的制度。在清朝末期,当英国人入侵西藏时,清政府试图在西藏实施改土归流的政策;然而,不久后清政府垮台了。软弱的民国政府自然不能在西藏有所作为。

    直到共产党统一了中国大陆,才回过头来处理西藏问题。由于共产党是个意识形态的政党,以改革社会制度为己任,自然对西藏的贵族统治看不顺眼。

    在59年推翻了西藏贵族,得罪了以达赖喇嘛为代表的统治阶层;在文革中,又得罪了普通民众,两边都不讨好其实,共产党统治西藏的政策一开始就可能是错误的。当西藏的贵族愿意合作的时候,应该笼络下去,既然贵族统治能延续几百年不变,那么到不如继续扶植这个政教合一、不以中央为敌的政权继续统治下去,在把握其军事和外交的权力后,继续帮助西藏贵族维持那种没有工业、没有威胁的原始生活,当时的藏族贵族并不是想发展壮大自己,而只是想维持在西藏的生活地位。本来翻身解放的农奴本来得到了废除贵族统治的种种好处,而在文革的时候却全部破坏干净,于是把藏族的平民也得罪的干干净净。

    在把藏人的贵族和平民都得罪之后呢,80年代又全盘否定自己的政策,并优待在外流亡的藏独势力,这样不仅使政府丧失威望(跟汉人地区一样),而且使藏人以汉人为代表的中央政府为敌,并全面倒向达赖。其实,中央政府对付达赖的办法并不多,当达赖在国内时,可以用优越的生活和位高权低的政治地位来迫使其采取合作的态度;然而当初放走达赖就是一个天大的错误,达赖在国外是不仅无生命危险,而且还生活得很滋润,自然会有更多的要求了,其实当初就不应该放达赖走。帮助和扶植一个亲中央、有统治传统的藏族贵族政权,要比建立和扶植一个亲中央的藏族民主政权要容易得多。达赖虽然是一个旧社会的统治贵族,是中央集权式的藏传佛教的金字塔顶端,但也是藏民族独立的图腾,是藏民族团结一致的象征和代表。

    现在共产党在西藏采取的政策,实在是没有办法的办法,为历史的包袱所累。一者,它当然不希望放弃手中的政权,即使是期待民主的汉人也不希望中央政府放弃在西藏的统治;二者,西藏也无法恢复过去的跟中央政府合作的贵族统治;再者,采用民主选举,必定选举出一个以汉人和中央政府为敌的藏人政府出来,这样必定会尸横遍野、血流成河。

    汉人和藏人从远古走到今天,并将走向未来,其总有和平,有合作,有矛盾,甚至有战争,关键在于如何调和,如何融合。

    在美国生活的我,从来就不认为美国的政治制度适合中国,将美国的体制放到欧亚大陆,甚至将美国正个国家搬到欧亚大陆,这个国家必定分崩离析战火连连。一人一票的普选制度只适合单一民族或者多民族而民族散居的国家,欧洲各国和美国就是典型的例子。而多民族但民族聚居的国家,贸然实行民主政治,必定会带来剧烈的社会动荡和民族危机,并最终造成民族分裂,前苏联和南斯拉夫就是典型的例子。

    中国的问题也尤其特殊,民族众多,但少数民族人口数量少。但为数只有10%的少数民族却拥有大量的国土,尽管其占领的土地相对贫瘠。一人一票的普选制度,只会让少数民族对中央政府失去希望,只会选出倾向独立的地方政府。这完全就是前苏联和南斯拉夫的翻版。

    因此,中国不敢贸然实行民主,从某种意义上说,正是以藏族和维族的独立势力和分裂的危险,拖累了中国的民主进程和中国的经济发展(花了不少钱养着)。当然,中国会让这些地方独立出去吗?不可能,因为这是国家安全的巨大的纵深,是国家安全的巨大屏障。

    从1959年的400万藏人到现在藏民600多万。中国没有也不可能实施种族灭绝,也不可能实施种族同化,因为汉人是不大愿意迁入贫瘠的藏区,藏人也很少从雪域高原下来。那么怎么办?只有一个子,拖!这正是目前中央政府对付西藏的办法。拖到什么时候?拖到流亡藏人与西藏地区的联系越来约淡,拖到西藏地区的经济发展起来,拖到现任达赖喇嘛死去,中央政府再树立一个新的达赖。不管新的达赖是不是现任达赖认可的,中央不在乎,但是中央绝对有机会对这个新的达赖大树特树!伴随着经济实惠,伴随着无穷无尽的宣传,因为西藏人民在自己手上,那么最终这个新达赖还是会得到藏族人民的认可的。历史上,达赖地位的确认和藏民对他的信仰,难道不是因为无穷无尽的宣传,无穷无尽的精神控制和恐吓,以及经济实惠来确立的吗(不要真以为达赖喇嘛是活菩萨或是神仙)?就这样,新的达赖就会慢慢占据藏族人的心灵,而他肯定会跟中央保持亲密无间的合作关系,流亡的藏人和现在的达赖最终会被藏族人民所抛弃,被历史所抛弃。

    历史就是这样发展的。

    虽然我上面所写的并不是藏人愿意听的,但我感谢唯色所提供这样的blog,使我可以跟你们进行理性的交流,而不是谩骂。

    回复删除
  4. 赫赫,共产党根本就无计可施,只有掩耳盗铃地拖,怎么成了解决西藏问题的灵丹妙药了呢?多少人在帮忙想解决方法,但是没有什么方法是切实可行的。

    回复删除
  5. 呵呵,恢复藏戏也好,连亿万人众目睽睽的奥运开幕式斗都在“假唱祖国”,雪顿能这样就不错了,阿佳啦也别要求过高了,雪顿节上的酸奶不是假的我就很开心了。祝阿佳啦节日快乐!

    回复删除
  6. 看看这条新闻,说谎最后是自取其辱:

    中国政府终于向日方承认,今年一月发生在日本的中国制饺子引致多人中毒事件,毒物很大可能是来自中国,工厂工作人员搀入的可能性很大。
    日本放送协会(NHK)30日报道表示,今年一月,河北省天洋食品公司所制造的冷冻水饺,在日本千叶及兵库县引致十人中毒,医院检出毒物为剧毒的达马松,是一种在日本很难找到,但在中国仍有用于化肥的毒物。
    日本警方年初曾以科学鉴定的方式仔细检查出问题的冷冻水饺、包装袋,并调查整个流通渠道,得出的结论是问题饺子“在日本被搀毒的可能性低”。不过中国警方则表示,实验结果为杀虫剂毒物成分是从冷冻饺子包装袋外侧渗透到内侧,不可能在中国境内被搀入。
    报道称,相关人士表示,在六月中国也发生同样中毒事件之后,中方改变了态度,认为饺子内的毒物由工厂相关人员搀入的可能性大,并已将此讯息转达给日方。

    回复删除